Previews

See also:

• Games: Video Games: Action-Adventure: News and Reviews  (0)

• ActionTrip Review - [40/100] By Ure Paul. "As it stands right now, there are just too many negative sides to it to warrant a purchase."
• The Armchair Empire Review (PS2) - [6.2/10] By Stefan Shetty. "The only thing done right in this game was graphics."
• Boomtown Review (PS2) - [7/10] By James Hamer-Morton. "Newcomers to the series would find this one a good one to start with...and will definitely have a good time."
• Gamer's Hell Review (PS2) - [4.2/10] By Michael Davis. "It looks and feels rushed and has no replay value."
• Gamespot - "Hard-core Tomb Raider fans and other patient players should be able to overlook the game's flaws and enjoy its engaging storyline, death-defying action sequences, and impressive locations." Review by Greg Kasavin with overall score [6.5] and screenshots.
• Gamespy Review (PC) - [52/100] By Kevin Rice. "A seemingly unfinished mess that's hard to recommend."
• Gamespy Review (PS2) - [34/100] By Paul Levesque. "Paying $50 for a bad game sucks. Paying $50 for an unfinished bad game sucks even more."
• GameSpy.com - GameSpy's March Preview by Andy Eddy on Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness.
• Gaming Nexus Review (PS2) - [5.3/10] By Charlie Sinhaseni. "Angel of Darkness is by no means a great game or even a decent one."
• Ugo Game Network Tomb Raider - Coverage of the new Tomb Raider game for the PC and Sony PlayStation 2.

• FiringSquad - Review by Brett Todd, with screen shots. "Stay away from Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness. Stay far, far away." Score: 35 out of 100. (August 1, 2003)
• GameSpot UK - "Core's latest Tomb Raider game is actually split up into three completely different parts." Preview by Amer Ajami. (March 26, 2002)